From: Dirk Geschke <dirk@lug-erding.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dirk@lug-erding.de
Subject: Re: Should calculation of vm.overcommit_ratio be changed?
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:51:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100420205144.GA7875@lug-erding.de> (raw)
Hi all,
I am not on the mailing list and a friend pointed me to this
thread...
Probably we had the same problem: We had a linux computer with
16 GB of RAM without swap. There was only one big job running
on it which did a lot of I/O. This program failed to allocate
much memory, we thought that this was due to the high amount
of cached memory use. To avoid problems with overcommit we had
set overcommit_memory to 2.
Now I have seen this thread and now it gets clear: The default
value of overcommit_ratio is 50, therefore one program can not
allocate more than 8GB of memory at all.
After reading this thread I wrote a little programm to allocate
memory in 512MB blocks and fill it with zeros. My test system
has 4GB of RAM and so I started:
qfix:~# free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 4052376 338124 3714252 0 0 17992
-/+ buffers/cache: 320132 3732244
Swap: 0 0 0
geschke@qfix:~$ ./a.out
got 1 * 512MB
got 2 * 512MB
got 3 * 512MB
malloc failure after 3 * 512 MB
So 1.5 GB are ok, 2 GB of possible 4GB not. I guess some memory of
the 4GB are not useable at all and therefore the limit is slightly
below 2GB with an overcommit_ratio=50.
Next step is to set overcommit_ratio=100:
qfix:~# echo 100 >/proc/sys/vm/overcommit_ratio
and run the porgram again:
geschke@qfix:~$ ./a.out
got 1 * 512MB
got 2 * 512MB
got 3 * 512MB
got 4 * 512MB
got 5 * 512MB
got 6 * 512MB
malloc failure after 6 * 512 MB
That are more than 3 GB but I would have expected to get at least
3.5GB:
geschke@qfix:~$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 4052376 344976 3707400 0 0 22472
-/+ buffers/cache: 322504 3729872
Swap: 0 0 0
Maybe this is due to a reserved percentage for the root user?
However, if I set overcommit_ratio=110 I get more than 3.5 GB:
geschke@qfix:~$ ./a.out
got 1 * 512MB
got 2 * 512MB
got 3 * 512MB
got 4 * 512MB
got 5 * 512MB
got 6 * 512MB
got 7 * 512MB
malloc failure after 7 * 512 MB
However, now I tested this with a high usage of cached memory, I
die a lot of I/O:
geschke@qfix:~$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 4052376 1945512 2106864 0 0 1621200
-/+ buffers/cache: 324312 3728064
Swap: 0 0 0
A new run gives:
geschke@qfix:~$ ./a.out
got 1 * 512MB
got 2 * 512MB
got 3 * 512MB
got 4 * 512MB
got 5 * 512MB
got 6 * 512MB
got 7 * 512MB
malloc failure after 7 * 512 MB
and:
qfix:~# free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 4052376 346928 3705448 0 0 26008
-/+ buffers/cache: 320920 3731456
Swap: 0 0 0
So the cached memory is not really a problem for malloc.
But since I am testing, I tried what will happens if a lot of memory
is already in use. So I opened a large file with "vi":
geschke@qfix:~$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 4052376 1597168 2455208 0 0 391364
-/+ buffers/cache: 1205804 2846572
Swap: 0 0 0
Now I start the program again:
geschke@qfix:~$ ./a.out
got 1 * 512MB
got 2 * 512MB
got 3 * 512MB
got 4 * 512MB
got 5 * 512MB
malloc failure after 5 * 512 MB
Fine: It seems that there is not really a problem to increase to
overcommit_ratio=100 if there is no swap in the system and one
has set overcommit_memory=2.
So I think, it is not really a problem to run with these settings.
Best regards
Dirk
--
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Dr. Dirk Geschke / Plankensteinweg 61 / 85435 Erding |
| Telefon: 08122-559448 / Mobil: 0176-96906350 / Fax: 08122-9818106 |
| dirk@geschke-online.de / dirk@lug-erding.de / kontakt@lug-erding.de |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
next reply other threads:[~2010-04-20 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-20 20:51 Dirk Geschke [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-20 13:40 Dave Wright
2010-04-20 17:32 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-20 18:06 ` Dave Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100420205144.GA7875@lug-erding.de \
--to=dirk@lug-erding.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome