From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: "R. Andrew Bailey" <bailey@akamai.com>
Cc: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>,
Yinghai <yinghai.lu@oracle.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
guenter.roeck@ericsson.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
yaneti@declera.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: never allocate PCI MMIO resources below BIOS_END
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:40:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004260940.52478.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100426125032.GA1623@akamai.com>
On Monday 26 April 2010 06:50:32 am R. Andrew Bailey wrote:
> On 23/04/10 17:05 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >On Wednesday 21 April 2010 01:31:20 pm Andy Isaacson wrote:
> >Would you guys (Andy & Andy, what a coincidence :-)) mind giving
> >it a try? This is intended to work on top of current upstream,
> >with no other patches required.
> >
> Good news- that solved it. I tried Yinghai's patches saturday to no
> avail (sorry it took me so long to get back to you, I was about 5 bios
> revisions behind on this machine and wanted to update it before I
> tried any more tests).
Great, thanks for testing this! The only problem here is that we
changed two things at once -- the BIOS and the patch, and we need
to figure out which change fixed the problem.
I want Linux to work correctly even on the old BIOS, on the theory
that "if Windows works, Linux should work, too." Changing a BIOS
is relatively risky, and it's not something I want users to have to
diagnose and deal with.
If we're lucky, the kernel without the patch will still fail on the
updated BIOS. If the pre-patch kernel fails and the post-patch kernel
works, and you can attach the entire dmesg log of the post-patch kernel
to the bugzilla, we should be able to see Linux making more sensible
BAR assignments when working around the BIOS bug. Then we can be pretty
confident that my patch fixed the problem.
If the pre-patch kernel works on the updated BIOS, that means one of
the BIOS updates fixed the BIOS bug, and we didn't actually exercise
my patch at all. If that's the case, we'll have to wait for a report
from the other Andy. (Or you could temporarily down-grade your BIOS
to the original version you had. But I don't know whether that's even
possible... it probably depends on the BIOS update tools.)
Thanks again for all your help. All progress in Linux depends on early
adopters like you who are willing to test kernels and help work through
issues :-)
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-26 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-07 21:06 [PATCH] x86: Reserve legacy VGA MMIO area for x86_64 as well as x86_32 Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-07 22:45 ` Yinghai
2010-04-07 23:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-07 23:22 ` Yinghai
2010-04-08 3:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-08 4:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-08 13:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-09 16:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-09 16:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-09 17:22 ` Yinghai
2010-04-09 18:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-09 18:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-04-09 19:55 ` Yinghai
2010-04-09 22:21 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-09 22:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-09 22:35 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-09 22:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-09 22:54 ` Yinghai
2010-04-09 23:01 ` Yinghai
2010-04-10 0:00 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-10 1:10 ` Yinghai
2010-04-10 1:43 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-10 1:48 ` Yinghai
2010-04-10 1:57 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-10 2:46 ` Yinghai
2010-04-12 18:54 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-12 19:34 ` Yinghai
2010-04-12 19:48 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-12 19:55 ` yinghai.lu
2010-04-12 20:02 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-12 22:32 ` [PATCH -v2 1/2] x86: Reserve [0xa0000, 0x100000] in e820 map Yinghai
2010-04-13 21:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-13 21:08 ` Yinghai
2010-04-13 21:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-13 21:11 ` Yinghai
2010-04-13 21:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-13 21:22 ` [PATCH -v3 1/3] " Yinghai
2010-04-23 23:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-26 15:35 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-04-13 21:23 ` [PATCH -v3 2/3] x86,pci, acpi: host bridge windows inherit BUSY flag from parent Yinghai
2010-04-13 21:24 ` [PATCH -v3 3/3] pci: don't allocate from a BUSY bus resource Yinghai
2010-04-13 21:42 ` [PATCH -v2 1/2] x86: Reserve [0xa0000, 0x100000] in e820 map Yinghai
2010-04-13 21:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-13 22:29 ` Yinghai
2010-04-13 22:39 ` Yinghai
2010-04-13 22:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-13 22:58 ` Yinghai
2010-04-13 23:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-13 23:03 ` Yinghai
2010-04-13 23:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-13 23:09 ` Yinghai
2010-04-21 5:33 ` [PATCH -v4 1/3] " Yinghai
2010-04-21 5:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, resource: Add reserve_region_with_split_check_child() Yinghai
2010-04-21 5:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86,pci,acpi: Handle invalid _CRS Yinghai
2010-04-21 15:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-21 16:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-21 16:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-21 22:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-21 23:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-21 23:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-21 23:43 ` Yinghai
2010-04-22 0:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-22 0:06 ` Yinghai
2010-04-21 19:31 ` [PATCH -v4 1/3] x86: Reserve [0xa0000, 0x100000] in e820 map Andy Isaacson
2010-04-23 23:05 ` [PATCH] x86/PCI: never allocate PCI MMIO resources below BIOS_END Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-23 23:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-24 0:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-26 12:50 ` R. Andrew Bailey
2010-04-26 15:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2010-04-26 18:34 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-26 19:31 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-04-26 20:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-26 20:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-04-26 21:07 ` Yinghai
2010-04-26 21:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-26 21:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-26 21:25 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-04-26 21:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-26 21:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-04-26 21:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-26 22:04 ` [PATCH -v5] reserve a0000 - 0x10000 Yinghai
[not found] ` <4BD60CD4.9020708@oracle.com>
2010-04-26 22:04 ` [PATCH -v5 1/3] x86: Reserve [0xa0000, 0x100000] in e820 map Yinghai
2010-04-26 22:04 ` [PATCH -v5 2/3] x86: Remove probe_roms for 32bit Yinghai
2010-04-26 22:04 ` [PATCH -v5 3/3] x86, resource: Add reserve_region_with_split_check_child() Yinghai
2010-04-26 21:44 ` [PATCH] x86/PCI: never allocate PCI MMIO resources below BIOS_END jacob pan
2010-04-13 23:03 ` [PATCH -v2 1/2] x86: Reserve [0xa0000, 0x100000] in e820 map H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-14 0:57 ` Yinghai
2010-04-14 16:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-14 17:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-14 19:25 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-14 19:27 ` Yinghai
2010-04-14 19:43 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-14 19:49 ` Yinghai
2010-04-12 22:33 ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86,pci, acpi: Inherent BUSY flag when setup_resource for root bus Yinghai
2010-04-12 22:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-04-13 21:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-09 20:11 ` [PATCH] x86: Reserve legacy VGA MMIO area for x86_64 as well as x86_32 H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-09 20:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-04-09 20:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-09 21:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-04-09 22:42 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-09 22:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-09 22:54 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-09 22:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-09 22:51 ` Alan Cox
2010-04-09 22:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-07 23:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-08 0:19 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-08 5:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-08 21:40 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-26 23:02 [PATCH] x86/PCI: never allocate PCI MMIO resources below BIOS_END H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-26 23:25 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-04-26 23:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-26 23:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-27 0:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-04-27 1:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-27 1:40 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-04-27 1:41 ` Yinghai
2010-04-27 15:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-28 16:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-28 17:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-28 19:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-28 19:10 ` Yinghai
2010-04-28 19:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-04-27 2:02 H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201004260940.52478.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=bailey@akamai.com \
--cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yaneti@declera.com \
--cc=yinghai.lu@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®