Re: INFO: umount blocked for more than 120 seconds

[Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4265 bytes --]

Hello,

Robert Hancock added to Cc list.

First of all, let me describe hw (sorry for skipping this part in prev. email).
The device is ASUS p535 in a card reader mode. The card is 1Gb MiniSD (Kingston).


On (04/26/10 15:36), Alan Stern wrote:
> Is this repeatable?
>
Yes.

kernel: [14980.102019] usb 2-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2
kernel: [14980.270773] usb 2-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0b05, idProduct=422f
kernel: [14980.270783] usb 2-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
kernel: [14980.270790] usb 2-1: Product: Generic Mass Storage
kernel: [14980.270797] usb 2-1: Manufacturer: ASUS
kernel: [14980.270803] usb 2-1: SerialNumber: *********************************
kernel: [14980.273767] scsi3 : usb-storage 2-1:1.0
kernel: [14981.279875] scsi scan: INQUIRY result too short (5), using 36
kernel: [14981.279890] scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access                                    PQ: 0 ANSI: 0
kernel: [14981.289597] sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
kernel: [14981.301967] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] 2012160 512-byte logical blocks: (1.03 GB/982 MiB)
kernel: [14981.304760] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
kernel: [14981.304765] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 06 00 00
kernel: [14981.304768] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
kernel: [14981.316864] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
kernel: [14981.316877]  sdb: sdb1
kernel: [14981.339861] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
kernel: [14981.339873] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk
kernel: [15014.446419] FAT: utf8 is not a recommended IO charset for FAT filesystems, filesystem will be case sensitive!
kernel: [15360.625323] INFO: task umount:7148 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
kernel: [15360.625332] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
kernel: [15360.625340] umount        D 00000dd9     0  7148   6292 0x00000000
kernel: [15360.625353]  f38bfe38 00000046 12abbd47 00000dd9 c1610cc0 c12c3890 c1610cc0 c1610cc0
kernel: [15360.625377]  c1610cc0 c1610cc0 f6fc5790 c1610cc0 00010bbe 00000000 12aab189 00000dd9
kernel: [15360.625400]  f6fc5500 f38bfe40 f38bfe70 00000000 f38bfe78 f38bfe40 c10b7cf0 f38bfe5c
kernel: [15360.625423] Call Trace:
kernel: [15360.625442]  [<c12c3890>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x36/0x5b
kernel: [15360.625457]  [<c10b7cf0>] bdi_sched_wait+0x8/0xc
kernel: [15360.625467]  [<c12c20ef>] __wait_on_bit+0x34/0x5b
kernel: [15360.625477]  [<c10b7ce8>] ? bdi_sched_wait+0x0/0xc
kernel: [15360.625487]  [<c12c216d>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x57/0x5f
kernel: [15360.625497]  [<c10b7ce8>] ? bdi_sched_wait+0x0/0xc
kernel: [15360.625510]  [<c103fa75>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x4d
kernel: [15360.625521]  [<c10b84d4>] wait_on_bit.clone.0+0x17/0x23
kernel: [15360.625531]  [<c10b8544>] sync_inodes_sb+0x64/0x10d
kernel: [15360.625546]  [<c10d373f>] ? vfs_quota_sync+0x0/0x1da
kernel: [15360.625556]  [<c10baef6>] __sync_filesystem+0x37/0x62
kernel: [15360.625566]  [<c10bb062>] sync_filesystem+0x3c/0x3f
kernel: [15360.625578]  [<c10a2def>] generic_shutdown_super+0x1c/0xca
kernel: [15360.625588]  [<c10a2eba>] kill_block_super+0x1d/0x31
kernel: [15360.625599]  [<c10a3833>] deactivate_super+0x48/0x5a
kernel: [15360.625610]  [<c10b385c>] mntput_no_expire+0x5e/0x89
kernel: [15360.625620]  [<c10b41cf>] sys_umount+0x277/0x29b
kernel: [15360.625631]  [<c10b4200>] sys_oldumount+0xd/0xf
kernel: [15360.625642]  [<c1002813>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
kernel: [15360.625652] 1 lock held by umount/7148:
kernel: [15360.625657]  #0:  (&type->s_umount_key#32){++++..}, at: [<c10a382e>] deactivate_super+0x43/0x5a


> Can you do this with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG enabled?  And acquire a usbmon 
> trace at the same time (see Documentation/usb/usbmon.txt)?
> 

Sure. Rebuilding the kernel right now.



Robert Hancock wrote:
> Is this some super-slow SD card or USB reader that you just wrote a bunch of data to? 
> It's not impossible it could take 2 minutes for the writeout of all the dirty data to
> complete on unmount.. 
Please see above.

> did the unmount ever complete?
No entry in /etc/mtab. So, I guess, yes - umount complete.


	Sergey

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]