From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756222Ab0D1V5J (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:57:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.corp.avencall.com ([91.194.178.12]:56884 "EHLO mx1.corp.avencall.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755186Ab0D1V5H (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:57:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:56:57 +0200 From: Guillaume Knispel To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Haavard Skinnemoen , Ingo Molnar , Lars-Peter Clausen , Linus Torvalds , Michael Buesch , Peter Zijlstra , Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] genirq: reliably replay pending edge-triggered irq Message-Id: <20100428235657.7120edd9.gknispel@proformatique.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1271941798-9659-1-git-send-email-gknispel@proformatique.com> <1271941798-9659-2-git-send-email-gknispel@proformatique.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.3.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:42:11 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Guillaume Knispel wrote: [snip] > > acked and masked at controller level and IRQ_PENDING is set. > > --- > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 4 ---- > > arch/arm/configs/acs5k_defconfig | 1 - > > arch/arm/configs/acs5k_tiny_defconfig | 1 - > > Changing the defconfigs should be a separate patch and I'm not > going to push such a thing through the genirq tree. The stale > entries do not hurt. Ok In this separate patch, to I put "genirq" in the title? Do I put it in the same series? Cheers, Guillaume Knispel