From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christofferdall@christofferdall.dk>
Cc: containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [C/R ARM v2][PATCH 1/3] ARM: Rudimentary syscall interfaces
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:08:08 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100429000808.CFFBD7154@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Christoffer Dall's message of Monday, 26 April 2010 17:43:41 -0400 <1272318223-28438-2-git-send-email-christofferdall@christofferdall.dk>
> + * syscalls.h - Linux syscall interfaces for ARM
s/syscalls/syscall/
> +static inline int get_swi_instruction(struct task_struct *task,
> + struct pt_regs *regs,
> + unsigned long *instr)
> +{
Why doesn't this just use access_process_vm?
> +/*
> + * This function essentially duplicates the logic from vector_swi in
> + * arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S. However, that code is in the
> + * critical path for system calls and is hard to factor out without
> + * compromising performance.
> + */
No clue about the ARM details, not reviewing that. I think this is too big
to be an inline and should be in some arch/arm/kernel/*.c place instead.
Of course, if (config_aeabi && !config_oabi) is true at compile time, it's
not large at all. So perhaps just move the compelx cases to a function
and leave the "Pure EABI" fork in the inline.
Thanks,
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-29 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-26 21:43 [C/R ARM v2][PATCH 0/3] Linux Checkpoint-Restart - ARM port Christoffer Dall
2010-04-26 21:43 ` [C/R ARM v2][PATCH 1/3] ARM: Rudimentary syscall interfaces Christoffer Dall
2010-04-29 0:08 ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2010-04-26 22:36 ` [C/R ARM v2][PATCH] " Christoffer Dall
2010-04-26 21:43 ` [C/R ARM v2][PATCH 2/3] ARM: Add the eclone system call Christoffer Dall
2010-04-26 21:43 ` [C/R ARM v2][PATCH 3/3] c/r: ARM implementation of checkpoint/restart Christoffer Dall
2010-06-20 21:34 ` [C/R ARM v2][PATCH 0/3] Linux Checkpoint-Restart - ARM port Oren Laadan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100429000808.CFFBD7154@magilla.sf.frob.com \
--to=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=christofferdall@christofferdall.dk \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®