From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756985Ab0D2Dh5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:37:57 -0400
Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:37475 "EHLO coco.kroah.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755847Ab0D2Dhh (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:37:37 -0400
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:38:18 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "Epshteyn, Eugene" <eugene.epshteyn@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] Mobile security processor driver
Message-ID: <20100429033818.GB27503@kroah.com>
References: <753F67ADE6F5094C9F1DBA00D1BAA8D325518252AF@orsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <753F67ADE6F5094C9F1DBA00D1BAA8D325518252AF@orsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 04:10:52PM -0700, Epshteyn, Eugene wrote:
> >From 9230c90ce19747554354c9fc93b3b1c8e661894c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark Allyn <mark.a.allyn@intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:41:39 -0700
> Subject: RFC [PATCH 4/4] staging: sep: Update TODO

Why are you including the patch twice?

> --- a/drivers/staging/sep/TODO
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sep/TODO

<snip>

Here's your list of what needs to be done to get this code merged, why
have you ignored it when asking us what we thought needed to be done.
Isn't this a good enough list of things left to complete?

again, totally confused,

greg k-h