From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752246Ab0EHIG4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 May 2010 04:06:56 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:48527 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751754Ab0EHIGv (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 May 2010 04:06:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 10:06:40 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: LKML , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Lin Ming Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86,perf: P4 PMU -- protect sensible procedures from preemption Message-ID: <20100508080640.GE2825@elte.hu> References: <20100507150517.GB16434@lenovo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100507150517.GB16434@lenovo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Looks good - but it doesnt apply cleanly to tip:master: Hunk #3 succeeded at 828 with fuzz 2 (offset 373 lines). Hunk #4 FAILED at 743. 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c is there some other patch dependency? Thanks, Ingo