From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932285Ab0EJVHs (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 10 May 2010 17:07:48 -0400
Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.158]:43837 "EHLO
	e37.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932229Ab0EJVHp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 10 May 2010 17:07:45 -0400
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 14:07:24 -0700
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>, Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
       Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>, Cedric Le Goater <legoater@free.fr>,
       Paul Menage <menage@google.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
       linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 015/100] cgroup freezer: Update stale locking
 comments
Message-ID: <20100510210724.GP31830@count0.beaverton.ibm.com>
References: <1272723382-19470-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu>
 <201005062140.19821.rjw@sisk.pl>
 <4BE333B0.1010003@cs.columbia.edu>
 <201005102301.45729.rjw@sisk.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201005102301.45729.rjw@sisk.pl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:01:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday 06 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
> > 
> > On 05/06/2010 03:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Saturday 01 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
> > >> From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
> > >>
> > >> Update stale comments regarding locking order and add a little more detail
> > >> so it's easier to follow the locking between the cgroup freezer and the
> > >> power management freezer code.
> > > 
> > > I guess these three patches are for me.
> > > 
> > > Do you want me to handle them?
> > 
> > Yes, please, that would be great.
> 
> However, patches 16 and 17 seem to depend on checkpoint/restart and don't
> appear to be margeable at this point.  Is this correct?

Strictly speaking they do not depend on checkpoint/restart. However, only
checkpoint/restart uses the functionality introduced by those patches so I
think you are correct that they aren't mergeable at this point.

Cheers,
	-Matt Helsley