Re: [PATCH 4/4] INIT_SIGHAND: use SIG_DFL instead of NULL

["Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>]

Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@redhat.com):
> Cosmetic, no changes in the compiled code. Just s/NULL/SIG_DFL/ to make
> it more readable and grep-friendly.
> 
> Note: probably SIG_IGN makes more sense, we could kill ignore_signals().
> But then kernel_init() should do flush_signal_handlers() before exec().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>

> ---
> 
>  include/linux/init_task.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- 34-rc1/include/linux/init_task.h~4_INIT_SIGHAND_USE_SIG_DFL	2010-05-10 20:26:08.000000000 +0200
> +++ 34-rc1/include/linux/init_task.h	2010-05-10 21:06:03.000000000 +0200
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ extern struct nsproxy init_nsproxy;
> 
>  #define INIT_SIGHAND(sighand) {						\
>  	.count		= ATOMIC_INIT(1), 				\
> -	.action		= { { { .sa_handler = NULL, } }, },		\
> +	.action		= { { { .sa_handler = SIG_DFL, } }, },		\
>  	.siglock	= __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(sighand.siglock),	\
>  	.signalfd_wqh	= __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(sighand.signalfd_wqh),	\
>  }