From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: greg@kroah.com, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, matthew@wil.cx,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, ddutile@redhat.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: allow sysfs file owner to read device dependent config space
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 10:59:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100513105911.6469c434@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100513012957.GB28034@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
On Wed, 12 May 2010 18:29:57 -0700
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org> wrote:
> The PCI config space bin_attr read handler has a hardcoded CAP_SYS_ADMIN
> check to verify privileges before allowing a user to read device
> dependent config space. This is meant to protect from an unprivileged
> user potentially locking up the box.
Or hacking it. You could argue the correct requirement is to change it to
require CAP_SYS_RAWIO in fact !
> With this patch the sysfs file owner is also considered privileged enough
> to read all of the config space.
Which breaks the main reason the check was there in the first place. To
stop accidents of the form
find / -exec grep {} "wibble"
blowing up in people's faces.
I agree with the problem - but IMHO the fix is to require opening the file
checks CAP_SYS_something instead: not to hack the read method and make it
even weirder and more un-Linux than it is now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-13 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-13 1:28 [PATCH 1/2] sysfs: add struct file* to bin_attr callbacks Chris Wright
2010-05-13 1:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] pci: allow sysfs file owner to read device dependent config space Chris Wright
2010-05-13 9:59 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2010-05-13 15:05 ` Chris Wright
2010-05-13 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] pci: check caps from sysfs file open " Chris Wright
2010-05-13 19:06 ` Greg KH
2010-05-13 19:16 ` Chris Wright
2010-05-13 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] pci: allow sysfs file owner " Avi Kivity
2010-05-13 11:02 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-05-14 19:09 ` Greg KH
2010-05-14 19:26 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100513105911.6469c434@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®