From: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>,
Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] Make sure timers have migrated before killing migration_thread
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:43:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100519121356.GB15237@amitarora.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274261515.5605.10423.camel@twins>
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:31:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 14:35 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the review!
> > diff -Nuarp linux-2.6.34.org/kernel/sched.c linux-2.6.34/kernel/sched.c
> > --- linux-2.6.34.org/kernel/sched.c 2010-05-18 22:56:21.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.34/kernel/sched.c 2010-05-18 22:58:31.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -5942,14 +5942,26 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
> > cpu_rq(cpu)->migration_thread = NULL;
> > break;
> >
> > + case CPU_POST_DEAD:
> > + /*
> > + Bring the migration thread down in CPU_POST_DEAD event,
> > + since the timers should have got migrated by now and thus
> > + we should not see a deadlock between trying to kill the
> > + migration thread and the sched_rt_period_timer.
> > + */
>
> Faulty comment style that, please use:
>
> /*
> * text
> * goes
> * here
> */
Sure.
> > + cpuset_lock();
> > + rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> > + kthread_stop(rq->migration_thread);
> > + put_task_struct(rq->migration_thread);
> > + rq->migration_thread = NULL;
> > + cpuset_unlock();
> > + break;
> > +
>
> The other problem is more urgent though, CPU_POST_DEAD runs outside of
> the hotplug lock and thus the above becomes a race where we could
> possible kill off the migration thread of a newly brought up cpu:
>
> cpu0 - down 2
> cpu1 - up 2 (allocs a new migration thread, and leaks the old one)
> cpu0 - post_down 2 - frees the migration thread -- oops!
Ok. So, how about adding a check in CPU_UP_PREPARE event handling too ?
The cpuset_lock will synchronize, and thus avoid race between killing of
migration_thread in up_prepare and post_dead events.
Here is the updated patch. If you don't like this one too, do you mind
suggesting an alternate approach to tackle the problem ? Thanks !
--
Regards,
Amit Arora
Signed-off-by: Amit Arora <aarora@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
--
diff -Nuarp linux-2.6.34.org/kernel/sched.c linux-2.6.34/kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.6.34.org/kernel/sched.c 2010-05-18 22:56:21.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.34/kernel/sched.c 2010-05-19 04:47:49.000000000 -0700
@@ -5900,6 +5900,19 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
case CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN:
+ cpuset_lock();
+ rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+ /*
+ * Since we now kill migration_thread in CPU_POST_DEAD event,
+ * there may be a race here. So, lets cleanup the old
+ * migration_thread on the rq, if any.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(rq->migration_thread)) {
+ kthread_stop(rq->migration_thread);
+ put_task_struct(rq->migration_thread);
+ rq->migration_thread = NULL;
+ }
+ cpuset_unlock();
p = kthread_create(migration_thread, hcpu, "migration/%d", cpu);
if (IS_ERR(p))
return NOTIFY_BAD;
@@ -5942,14 +5955,34 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
cpu_rq(cpu)->migration_thread = NULL;
break;
+ case CPU_POST_DEAD:
+ /*
+ * Bring the migration thread down in CPU_POST_DEAD event,
+ * since the timers should have got migrated by now and thus
+ * we should not see a deadlock between trying to kill the
+ * migration thread and the sched_rt_period_timer.
+ */
+ cpuset_lock();
+ rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+ if (likely(rq->migration_thread)) {
+ /*
+ * Its possible that this CPU was onlined (from a
+ * different CPU) before we reached here and
+ * migration_thread was cleaned-up in the
+ * CPU_UP_PREPARE event handling.
+ */
+ kthread_stop(rq->migration_thread);
+ put_task_struct(rq->migration_thread);
+ rq->migration_thread = NULL;
+ }
+ cpuset_unlock();
+ break;
+
case CPU_DEAD:
case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
cpuset_lock(); /* around calls to cpuset_cpus_allowed_lock() */
migrate_live_tasks(cpu);
rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- kthread_stop(rq->migration_thread);
- put_task_struct(rq->migration_thread);
- rq->migration_thread = NULL;
/* Idle task back to normal (off runqueue, low prio) */
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
update_rq_clock(rq);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-19 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-19 9:05 [PATCH] " Amit K. Arora
2010-05-19 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-19 12:13 ` Amit K. Arora [this message]
2010-05-20 7:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-23 9:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-05-23 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-24 6:43 ` Amit K. Arora
2010-05-25 20:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-26 6:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-24 9:59 ` [PATCH] " Amit K. Arora
2010-05-24 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-24 15:16 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-05-24 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-25 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-25 12:10 ` Amit K. Arora
2010-05-25 13:23 ` [PATCH v3] " Amit K. Arora
2010-05-25 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-25 16:27 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 7:18 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Make sure timers have migrated before killing the migration_thread tip-bot for Amit K. Arora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100519121356.GB15237@amitarora.in.ibm.com \
--to=aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®