From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753036Ab0EWJFy (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2010 05:05:54 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:51068 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750869Ab0EWJFv (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2010 05:05:51 -0400 Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 11:05:44 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Tejun Heo Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq Message-ID: <20100523090544.GB25524@elte.hu> References: <1273747705-7829-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <4BF1CD92.9030800@kernel.org> <4BF689DD.2090306@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BF689DD.2090306@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Peter, Ingo. > > On 05/18/2010 01:13 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On 05/13/2010 12:48 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > >> These four patches are the scheduler modifications necessary for cmwq > >> and contains the following four patches. > > > > Ping. > > > > I know we're inside -rc1 merge window but I'm really > hoping to push cmwq through linux-next during this devel > cycle as the whole thing basically has been blocked > unchanged on scheduler changes for a couple of months > now. So, can we please get this thing moving? IIRC these changes are for some sort of speedup for btrfs, right? I would really like to see before/after numbers on some important FS workload. How much of a speedup does it give? Thanks, Ingo