From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759460Ab0E0SO0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 14:14:26 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:51145 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754644Ab0E0SOX (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 14:14:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:20:56 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Alan Stern , Thomas Gleixner , Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, LKML , Florian Mickler , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Message-ID: <20100527192056.6fd32c1d@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100527175719.GD3543@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1274982779.27810.5708.camel@twins> <20100527175719.GD3543@srcf.ucam.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 May 2010 18:57:19 +0100 Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:52:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Shall we henceforth stop confusing forced suspend for laptops and > > powersaving a running system? > > If you want to support forced suspend for laptops and you want to avoid > the risk of losing wakeups then you need in-kernel suspend blockers. It isn't suspend blockers or nothing. Look at the bigger picture.