From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755434Ab0E0WoK (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 18:44:10 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:50282 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753119Ab0E0WoH (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 18:44:07 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 00:45:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.34-rjw; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Alan Cox , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Alan Stern , Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, LKML , Florian Mickler , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM References: <20100527190515.08be091a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100527181533.GH3543@srcf.ucam.org> In-Reply-To: <20100527181533.GH3543@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005280045.32571.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 27 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:05:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > I'd prefer we avoided mixing them up. Everyone seems fairly happy with > > the current operator ordered suspend behaviour I believe ? > > No. The current mechanism can lose wakeup events. As long as the operator agrees to lose wakeup events occasionally, which is the case at least 99% of the time, there's nothing wrong with that IMO. Rafael