From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756714Ab0E2U0f (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2010 16:26:35 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:56852 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756494Ab0E2U0d (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2010 16:26:33 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Len Brown Subject: Re: [git pull request] ACPI patches for 2.6.35-merge Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 22:27:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.34-rjw; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <201005290036.34495.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005292227.57939.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 29 May 2010, Len Brown wrote: > > > Hmm, it looks like you omitted these two: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/91560/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/91558/ > > > > Was that intentional or were they simply forgotten? > > I missed those two. > Strange -- I recall discussing them in April, > so don't know why they were not in my test tree since then. > > Anyway, they're in acpi-test now, and as it is a bug fix, > with just a small re-name, should be fine for the next push. Thanks!