From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932673Ab0FBPa4 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 2 Jun 2010 11:30:56 -0400
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:39565
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932640Ab0FBPay (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 2 Jun 2010 11:30:54 -0400
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 08:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20100602.083104.123416857.davem@davemloft.net>
To: gabriele.paoloni@intel.com
Cc: ben@netservers.co.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppp_generic: fix multilink fragment sizes
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <DF7BB929B28FCF479E888E3D9F8D9E88D3E16B5A@irsmsx502.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <4C0670E2.1090708@netservers.co.uk>
	<1275491094-9526-1-git-send-email-ben@netservers.co.uk>
	<DF7BB929B28FCF479E888E3D9F8D9E88D3E16B5A@irsmsx502.ger.corp.intel.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: "Paoloni, Gabriele" <gabriele.paoloni@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:17:59 +0100

> The proposed patch looks wrong to me.

Can you please reply to postings properly?  Use the reply function
of your mail client and do not "top post."

Because of the way you just simply inlined the entirety of Ben's
patch posting, it ends up looking like a new patch being posted
on patchwork and this makes more work and analysis for me.

Thanks.