From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933829Ab0FCD6e (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 23:58:34 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:39365 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933797Ab0FCD6c (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 23:58:32 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] rcu: finalize debugobjects, first round of RCU sparse pointer checks Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, sparse@chrisli.org In-Reply-To: <20100602085254.778aaf31.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20100602192749.F512.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100602085254.778aaf31.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-Id: <20100603125804.7245.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 12:58:26 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 19:34:41 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > > Hello, Ingo, > > > > > > Here are the final commits from Mathieu's debugobjects series and the > > > first few from Arnd's RCU-pointer sparse series. The first three remove > > > RCU's (useless) initializations from mm, fs, and powerpc: > > > > > > mm: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/18/562 > > > fs: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/18/500 > > > powerpc:http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg43510.html > > > > > > Kosaki Motohiro agreed that the mm patch should go up -tip, and none of > > > the other maintainers objected to the prospect of their patches going > > > up -tip. > > > > Andrew, can we hear your opinion? I think this patch series have some > > dependencies, then -tip is best place. If any code confliction occur, > > I promise I'll solve it soon. > > > > A wee little two-line patch? Go wild! Thank you!