From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753021Ab0FHITB (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 04:19:01 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:59903 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751227Ab0FHIS5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 04:18:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:25:54 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Kees Cook Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Dave Young , Al Viro , Eric Paris , Christoph Hellwig , James Morris , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Andrew Morton , Jiri Kosina , Martin Schwidefsky , David Howells , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Tim Gardner , "Serge E. Hallyn" , tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] fs: allow protected cross-uid sticky symlinks Message-ID: <20100608092554.34e9296f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100607210618.GI6839@outflux.net> References: <20100603080158.GE4971@outflux.net> <20100603210051.GD4714@outflux.net> <6305.1275927536@localhost> <20100607164257.GD6839@outflux.net> <20100607210618.GI6839@outflux.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > For the people objecting to the actual code of the patch, I'm very > interested in finding a solution. I am obviously not a Linux kernel VFS > maintainer. I'm very keen to find an acceptable version of the patch > based on feedback from those that know this area of the kernel intimately. You've already had those suggestions some days ago. Use a security module, either by using something like SELinux (where you can do this just fine as far as I can see including exceptions by label for problem apps), or write your own little seucrity module that does it. Or for that matter just leave it as an Ubuntu patch. Since you didn't seem t get the hint earlier I also suspecifically NAK the current patch. Alan