From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755259Ab0FHTQa (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:16:30 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:47384 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752140Ab0FHTQ3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:16:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:16:17 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Cliff Wickman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, gregkh@suse.de, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/11] x86, UV: calculate BAU destination timeout Message-ID: <20100608191617.GE25985@elte.hu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: 1.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: s X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 1.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4683] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cliff, this 11 patch UV series looks a lot more manageable (and very clean as well), so i've applied them to tip:x86/uv. Thanks! Ingo