From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755392Ab0FIAHV (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:07:21 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:51501 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751385Ab0FIAHT (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:07:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 17:07:13 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Joe Perches Cc: Andrew Morton , Andrew Lunn , Jarod Wilson , Jakub Schmidtke , Henk de Groot , Naren Sankar , Jonathan Cameron , Pavel Machek , Luis Rodriguez , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Mori Hess , Steve Underwood , Simon Wunderlich , Arnaud Patard , Marek Lindner , Teddy Wang , Ossama Othman , Haiyang Zhang , Ian Abbott , Willy Tarreau , Scott Davilla , Scott Smedley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Forest Bond , David Rowe Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] MAINTAINERS: Add drivers/staging entries Message-ID: <20100609000713.GB16160@kroah.com> References: <20100608211246.GC10657@kroah.com> <1276032382.24044.23.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1276032382.24044.23.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:26:22PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 14:12 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:49:34AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > Some drivers/staging directories use a TODO file with email entries. > > > Make the same entries in the normal MAINTAINERS file. > > > > No, please don't do this. I don't want to clutter up the MAINTAINERS > > file with staging stuff. > > It's not clutter when it helps get patches to the right reviewers > or responsible parties. That's my job as staging maintainer, right? Am I somehow not doing this properly? > > The get_maintainer.pl script handles staging > > patches just fine today without this being needed at all. > > Dubious. > > Many of these nominal maintainer email entries are not > found in git logs. Many, but not all, as you pointed out. > > I also found it a bit odd you didn't send these to the stable subsystem > > maintainer, why? > > The MAINTAINERS patches are forward going, not historical. What does that mean?