From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, James.Bottomley@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: defer the use of inline biovecs for discard requests
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:37:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100628123742.GB19497@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2896C6.9030607@kernel.dk>
On Mon, Jun 28 2010 at 8:34am -0400,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> On 2010-06-26 21:56, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Don't alloc discard bio with a biovec in blkdev_issue_discard. Doing so
> > means bio_has_data() will not be true until the SCSI layer adds the
> > payload to the discard request via blk_add_request_payload.
>
> Sorry, this looks horrible.
Your judgment isn't giving me much to work with... not sure where I go
with "horrible".
> What is the point of this?!
Enables discard requests with _not_ return true for bio_has_data().
> > bio_{enable,disable}_inline_vecs are not expected to be widely used so
> > they were exported using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
>
> Never export anything that doesn't have an in-kernel modular user.
Yeap, v2 removed the exports.
> > This patch avoids the need for the following VM accounting fix for
> > discards: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/23/361
> > NOTE: Jens, you said you applied Tao Ma's fix but I cannot see it in
> > your linux-2.6-block's for-next or for-2.6.36... as such I didn't revert
> > it in this patch.
>
> It's in the for-linus branch, that is stuff headed for the current
> kernel.
OK.
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-28 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-18 14:59 [PATCH, RFC] block: don't allocate a payload for discard request Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-19 4:25 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-22 18:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-26 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: fix leaks associated with discard request payload Mike Snitzer
2010-06-27 8:49 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-27 9:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-27 10:01 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-27 10:35 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-27 11:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-27 12:32 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-27 14:16 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-27 15:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-27 16:23 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-27 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-28 7:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-28 8:14 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-28 8:18 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-28 8:45 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-28 15:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-30 11:55 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-07-01 4:21 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-27 9:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-27 15:29 ` James Bottomley
2010-06-28 17:16 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-06-29 8:00 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-29 22:28 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2010-06-29 23:03 ` James Bottomley
2010-06-29 23:51 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-30 0:11 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2010-06-30 14:22 ` James Bottomley
2010-06-30 15:36 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-30 16:26 ` James Bottomley
2010-07-01 12:28 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2010-07-01 12:46 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-07-01 14:03 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-07-01 12:49 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2010-06-30 8:32 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-30 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-30 10:25 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-30 10:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-30 10:57 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-30 12:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-26 19:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: defer the use of inline biovecs for discard requests Mike Snitzer
2010-06-27 9:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-27 14:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-27 14:55 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Mike Snitzer
2010-06-27 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-28 10:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] " FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-28 12:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-28 15:15 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-06-28 15:31 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-06-28 12:34 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-28 12:37 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2010-06-28 12:41 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-28 12:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-28 12:49 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-28 12:45 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100628123742.GB19497@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome