Re: [PATCH] arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c: Use ";" not "," to terminate statements

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:

> Needed if pr_<level> becomes a bit more space efficient.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c
> index 06130b5..c5f59d0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c
> @@ -632,9 +632,9 @@ static void __init mtrr_print_out_one_result(int i)
>  	unsigned long gran_base, chunk_base, lose_base;
>  	char gran_factor, chunk_factor, lose_factor;
>  
> -	gran_base = to_size_factor(result[i].gran_sizek, &gran_factor),
> -	chunk_base = to_size_factor(result[i].chunk_sizek, &chunk_factor),
> -	lose_base = to_size_factor(result[i].lose_cover_sizek, &lose_factor),
> +	gran_base = to_size_factor(result[i].gran_sizek, &gran_factor);
> +	chunk_base = to_size_factor(result[i].chunk_sizek, &chunk_factor);
> +	lose_base = to_size_factor(result[i].lose_cover_sizek, &lose_factor);

That file and this subsystem needs a lot more cleanups than just this. Would 
you be willing to do them all, so that we can get over with the churn in a 
single well-defined patch (or patches)?

I dont see much point in piecemail single-comma patches - i'd rather wait for 
someone else who'd fix this and other details in one go.

Thanks,

	Ingo