mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
	Pierre Tardy <tardyp@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf migration
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 09:19:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100708071942.GA26454@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100707151318.GA5984@nowhere>


* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> To begin with, the name is a bit pompous. It's not a strong cpu task 
> migration observer as it's only based on the number of tasks living in a cpu 
> runqueue. This is the only basis for the cpu load: it doesn't handle the 
> nice level, scheduler classes, of each tasks (except idle ones that don't 
> count on the load).
> 
> At least not yet.
> 
> But still I think it's a cool toy, I've been playing with it for the last 
> weeks and it can give you a nice overview of what happens wrt migration 
> decisions for each migration opportunities: wake up, fork and exec, sleep 
> (sleep doesn't involve migration decision, but it's still an rq detach), and 
> load balancing. In fact it's more about "runqueue events".

Cool, looks really nice!

> == How to use ==
> 
> 
> I suggest you to use latest tip:/perf/core
> 
> Run the following command (followed by a command if you want):
> 
> $ sudo ./perf record -m 16384 -a -e sched:sched_wakeup -e sched:sched_wakeup_new -e sched:sched_switch -e sched:sched_migrate_task

Does 'perf sched record' include these events?

> Now ensure you have no lost events:
> 
> 
> $ sudo ./perf trace -d
> Misordered timestamps: 0
> Lost events: 0 <----

We need some warning for this in the GUI i guess?

> If so you need to increase the buffer size (-m nr_pages option in perf record).
> 
> Then put the script in the tools/perf directory and run it:
> 
> $ ./perf trace -s migration.py
> 
> You'll need wxpython.

Looks like this could be turned into 'perf sched view' or 'perf sched 
migration'?

How tasks schedule/migrate is basically how scheduler developers look at 
sched-trace data, so it would be nice if your GUI became the gui for perf 
sched.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-08  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-07 15:13 Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-08  7:19 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-07-20 14:59   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100708071942.GA26454@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tardyp@gmail.com \
    --cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome