Hello,

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:07:41AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 01:50:47PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Linus Torvalds
> > <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> wrote:
> > >> I think Uwe could provide his script and add it to the kernel tree.
> > >> Then all architectures could benefit from it.  Having the defconfig
> > >> files contain only those options which are different from the defaults
> > >> is certainly more readable, even on x86.
> > >
> > > Quite possible. But maintainers would need to be on the lookout of
> > > people actually using the script, and refusing to apply patches that
> > > re-introduce the whole big thing.
> > 
> > I can (partially) speak for powerpc.  If ARM uses this approach, then
> > I think we can do the same.  After the defconfigs are trimmed, I
> > certainly won't pick up any more full defconfigs.
> I just restarted my script on the powerpc defconfigs basing on rc5, I
> assume they complete in a few days time.
So Stephen was faster than me.  I don't know yet how he optimised my
script, meanwhile I put some efforts into it, too by just checking lines
that match "^(# )?CONFIG_".

Find it attached.

I will start to reduce the remaining configs (i.e. all but arm and
powerpc).

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |