mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHv2] trace: funcgraph tracer - adding funcgraph-irq option
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:19:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100723131913.GB1829@jolsa.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279828821.3319.23.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:00:21PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 18:21 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> 
SNIP

> 
> What happens if we lose the return event? That is, due to buffer
> overruns, the return of the trace is lost. Then we lose out on all
> events until another event of the same IRQ happens and its return is not
> lost.
> 
> You should save the depth instead of the function. When you are in a
> interrupt, record the depth. Then when the depth is less than or equal
> to the recorded depth you can restart printing. This may still suffer
> from missed returns, but it would not have as much of a consequence when
> it happens.
hi,
you're right, changed patch is attached

thanks,
jirka

---
Adding funcgraph-irq option for function graph tracer.

It's handy to be able to disable the irq related output
and not to have to jump over each irq related code, when
you have no interrest in it.

The option is by default enabled, so there's no change to
current behaviour. It affects only the final output, so all
the irq related data stays in the ring buffer.

wbr,
jirka


Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c |  101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
index 6bff236..e66f71f 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 struct fgraph_cpu_data {
 	pid_t		last_pid;
 	int		depth;
+	int		depth_irq;
 	int		ignore;
 	unsigned long	enter_funcs[FTRACE_RETFUNC_DEPTH];
 };
@@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ struct fgraph_data {
 #define TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_PROC		0x8
 #define TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_DURATION	0x10
 #define TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_ABS_TIME	0x20
+#define TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS		0x40
 
 static struct tracer_opt trace_opts[] = {
 	/* Display overruns? (for self-debug purpose) */
@@ -55,13 +57,15 @@ static struct tracer_opt trace_opts[] = {
 	{ TRACER_OPT(funcgraph-duration, TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_DURATION) },
 	/* Display absolute time of an entry */
 	{ TRACER_OPT(funcgraph-abstime, TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_ABS_TIME) },
+	/* Display interrupts */
+	{ TRACER_OPT(funcgraph-irqs, TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS) },
 	{ } /* Empty entry */
 };
 
 static struct tracer_flags tracer_flags = {
 	/* Don't display overruns and proc by default */
 	.val = TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_CPU | TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_OVERHEAD |
-	       TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_DURATION,
+	       TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_DURATION | TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS,
 	.opts = trace_opts
 };
 
@@ -847,6 +851,92 @@ print_graph_prologue(struct trace_iterator *iter, struct trace_seq *s,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Entry check for irq code
+ *
+ * returns 1 if
+ *  - we are inside irq code
+ *  - we just extered irq code
+ *
+ * retunns 0 if
+ *  - funcgraph-interrupts option is set
+ *  - we are not inside irq code
+ */
+static int
+check_irq_entry(struct trace_iterator *iter, u32 flags,
+		unsigned long addr, int depth)
+{
+	int cpu = iter->cpu;
+	struct fgraph_data *data = iter->private;
+	int *depth_irq = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->depth_irq);
+
+	if (flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * We are inside the irq code
+	 */
+	if (*depth_irq >= 0)
+		return 1;
+
+	if ((addr < (unsigned long)__irqentry_text_start) ||
+	    (addr >= (unsigned long)__irqentry_text_end))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * We are entering irq code.
+	 */
+	*depth_irq = depth;
+	return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Return check for irq code
+ *
+ * returns 1 if
+ *  - we are inside irq code
+ *  - we just left irq code
+ *
+ * returns 0 if
+ *  - funcgraph-interrupts option is set
+ *  - we are not inside irq code
+ */
+static int
+check_irq_return(struct trace_iterator *iter, u32 flags, int depth)
+{
+	int cpu = iter->cpu;
+	struct fgraph_data *data = iter->private;
+	int *depth_irq = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->depth_irq);
+
+	if (flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * We are not inside the irq code.
+	 */
+	if (*depth_irq == -1)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * We are inside the irq code, and this is returning entry.
+	 * Let's not trace it and clear the entry depth, since
+	 * we are out of irq code.
+	 *
+	 * This condition ensures that we 'leave the irq code' once
+	 * we are out of the entry depth. Thus protecting us from
+	 * the RETURN entry loss.
+	 */
+	if (*depth_irq >= depth) {
+		*depth_irq = -1;
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * We are inside the irq code, and this is not the entry.
+	 */
+	return 1;
+}
+
 static enum print_line_t
 print_graph_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent_entry *field, struct trace_seq *s,
 			struct trace_iterator *iter, u32 flags)
@@ -857,6 +947,9 @@ print_graph_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent_entry *field, struct trace_seq *s,
 	static enum print_line_t ret;
 	int cpu = iter->cpu;
 
+	if (check_irq_entry(iter, flags, call->func, call->depth))
+		return TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED;
+
 	if (print_graph_prologue(iter, s, TRACE_GRAPH_ENT, call->func, flags))
 		return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
 
@@ -894,6 +987,9 @@ print_graph_return(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace, struct trace_seq *s,
 	int ret;
 	int i;
 
+	if (check_irq_return(iter, flags, trace->depth))
+		return TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED;
+
 	if (data) {
 		struct fgraph_cpu_data *cpu_data;
 		int cpu = iter->cpu;
@@ -1202,9 +1298,12 @@ void graph_trace_open(struct trace_iterator *iter)
 		pid_t *pid = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->last_pid);
 		int *depth = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->depth);
 		int *ignore = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->ignore);
+		int *depth_irq = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->depth_irq);
+
 		*pid = -1;
 		*depth = 0;
 		*ignore = 0;
+		*depth_irq = -1;
 	}
 
 	iter->private = data;

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-23 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-12 16:21 [PATCH] " Jiri Olsa
2010-07-22 20:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-07-23 13:19   ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
     [not found]     ` <20100907113102.GA1912@jolsa.brq.redhat.com>
     [not found]       ` <1283867057.5133.75.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
2010-09-07 14:53         ` [PATCHv2] " Jiri Olsa
2010-09-15  8:41           ` [tip:perf/core] tracing: Add funcgraph-irq option for function graph tracer tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2010-09-07 16:28     ` [PATCHv2] trace: funcgraph tracer - adding funcgraph-irq option Steven Rostedt
2010-09-07 17:19       ` Johannes Weiner
2010-09-09 14:44       ` Johannes Weiner
2010-09-09 18:10         ` Jiri Olsa
2010-09-11  1:18         ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100723131913.GB1829@jolsa.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®