From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753759Ab0GZH22 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:28:28 -0400 Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:39866 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753014Ab0GZH20 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:28:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:28:25 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Denys Vlasenko Cc: Tim Abbott , Tim Bird , James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Fleming , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Michal Marek , Parisc List Subject: Re: Testing of function/data-sections on linux-2.6.35-rc4 Message-ID: <20100726072825.GC10061@merkur.ravnborg.org> References: <201007181703.17022.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <20100723203543.GB27288@merkur.ravnborg.org> <201007260331.34372.vda.linux@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201007260331.34372.vda.linux@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 03:31:34AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > Hi Sam, > > On Friday 23 July 2010 22:35, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > > Then, in order to also garbage-collect the sections, I added > > > > > > LDFLAGS_vmlinux += --gc-sections > > > > > > in top-level Makefile. > > > > > > This requires the additional patch (linux-2.6.35-rc4-fsgs.patch) > > > which adds KEEP(section) directives to kernel linker stripts. > > > Otherwise, linker will discard some crucial sections. > > > > > > > Changelog does not address why you need: > > > > -Map $@.ldmap > > > > and what effect they have. > > I didn't plan to push the last step (--gc-sections) to mainline yet. > Thus the patch has debugging stuff in it. > > > > And it is obvious that some archs should consolidate a little more from > > asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h. > > But that said this patch looks much better than the initial versions posted. > > > > How do you determine which sections needs the KEEP()? > > Worth documenting for future when we add new sections. > > No problem, I will be adding comments at every KEEP() why it's needed. A general comment in vmlinux.lds.h and a careful explanation in the changelog should be enough. You should not comment each of the KEEP(). Sam