From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754100Ab0GaScS (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:32:18 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:52938 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753523Ab0GaScR (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:32:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=kLwbFmWovCCAiOYqizFw8y7EHD2W04cldq0XieQiXQk0tX4yUYHwJNRzo1Jd4//MPO CJPPbHk4l8g6RNdRgH/2+F/EP8PLhvb8fDrfRkkHSUNKUSkh1zyCS2QBBmGEdJrtAaBj FnoIKl+gG2a2ztg1kiQsbK8N19MR35deiXVQA= Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:32:11 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Pekka Enberg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,setup: add serial_console_port_base in boot_params Message-ID: <20100731183211.GB29357@lenovo> References: <4C3F8B46.7080809@kernel.org> <20100731083409.GC5859@lenovo> <4C5469AF.2010608@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C5469AF.2010608@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:21:35AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 07/31/2010 01:34 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:27:18PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> > >> to save the early_serial_base. > >> > >> Also bootloader could fill that field, so setup code could reuse it. > >> > >> decompress code could reuse early serial console from setup code. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu > >> > > > > Hi Yinghai, sorry for delayed response. I like the idea much since it'll allow > > to log decompressor messages in case if someone would be changing exitsting code > > or developing new one, though this touches boot protocol so that grub/syslinux > > and friends will have to update their code as well which of course need some > > time. > > > > No, this is the internal part of the boot protocol, so it's not an issue. > Peter, I didn't mean any issue here, I meant that bootloaders don't know about this field yet and they will have to update own sources to pass port value at proper place of boot params. Or I miss something? > -hpa > -- Cyrill