From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
To: Kay Diederichs <Kay.Diederichs@uni-konstanz.de>
Cc: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@gmail.com>,
linux <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Karsten Schaefer <karsten.schaefer@uni-konstanz.de>
Subject: Re: ext4 performance regression 2.6.27-stable versus 2.6.32 and later
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 13:10:01 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100802161001.GF32757@khazad-dum.debian.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100802160405.GE32757@khazad-dum.debian.net>
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Kay Diederichs wrote:
> > Performance-wise, we tried mounting with barrier versus nobarrier (or
> > barrier=1 versus barrier=0) and re-did the 2.6.32+ benchmarks. It turned
> > out that the benchmark difference with and without barrier is less than
> > the variation between runs (which is much higher with 2.6.32+ than with
> > 2.6.27-stable), so the influence seems to be minor.
>
> Did you check interactions with the IO scheduler?
Never mind, I reread your first message, and you did. I apologise for the
noise.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-02 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-28 19:51 Kay Diederichs
2010-07-28 21:00 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-08-02 10:47 ` Kay Diederichs
2010-08-02 16:04 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-08-02 16:10 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [this message]
2010-07-29 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2010-08-02 14:52 ` Kay Diederichs
2010-08-02 16:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-08-02 21:08 ` Kay Diederichs
2010-08-03 13:31 ` Kay Diederichs
2010-07-30 2:20 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-07-30 21:01 ` Kay Diederichs
2010-08-01 23:02 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-08-02 15:28 ` Kay Diederichs
[not found] ` <4C56E47B.8080600@uni-konstanz.de>
[not found] ` <20100802202123.GC25653@thunk.org>
2010-08-04 8:18 ` Kay Diederichs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100802161001.GF32757@khazad-dum.debian.net \
--to=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=Kay.Diederichs@uni-konstanz.de \
--cc=greg.freemyer@gmail.com \
--cc=karsten.schaefer@uni-konstanz.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®