From: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] Merge kexec-tools into the kernel tree
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:22:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100804072246.GA5263@cr0.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100804070647.GB24064@verge.net.au>
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 04:06:48PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>Hi,
>
>After all the excitement of relocating kexec-tools from
>one location on kernel.org to another last week it was
>suggested to me by Michael Neuling that the merging
>kexec-tools into the kernel tree would be a good idea.
>
>Given that there have been a bunch of issues with kexec
>on power that this would resolve. and there is precedence
>for tools in the kernel tree, this sounds entirely reasonable to me.
>So with my kexec-tools maintainer hat on, I would like to start
>a conversation about this.
>
But why? Just to draw more attentions from kernel community?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-04 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-04 7:06 Simon Horman
2010-08-04 7:22 ` Américo Wang [this message]
2010-08-04 7:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-04 15:05 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 23:11 ` Michael Neuling
2010-08-05 0:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-05 1:19 ` Michael Neuling
2010-08-05 3:26 ` Américo Wang
2010-08-05 3:22 ` Américo Wang
2010-08-04 8:08 ` Bernhard Walle
2010-08-04 12:26 ` Neil Horman
2010-08-05 6:40 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100804072246.GA5263@cr0.nay.redhat.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome