From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Subject: Re: missing .data.shared_align placement in vmlinux
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 22:28:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100804202806.GA22134@merkur.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikz7pvirg7VUxrm-6v=yrLwHy4UeaJTS0wz3BLc@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:12:03PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 07:56, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 04:58:53PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> am i missing something or does the .data.shared_align section lack
> >> definition in vmlinux.lds.h and all arch vmlinux.lds.S files ?
> >>
> >> with the recent change "net: remove time limit in process_backlog()",
> >> the softnet_data variable changed from "DEFINE_PER_CPU()" to
> >> "DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED()" which moved it from the .data section to
> >> the .data.shared_align section. i'm not saying this patch is wrong,
> >> just that is what caused me to notice this larger problem. no one
> >> else in the kernel is using this aligned macro variant, so i imagine
> >> that's why no one has noticed yet.
> >>
> >> since .data.shared_align isnt declared in any vmlinux files that i can
> >> see, the linker just places it last. this "just works" for most
> >> people, but when building a ROM kernel on Blackfin systems, it causes
> >> section overlap errors:
> >> bfin-uclinux-ld.real: section .init.data [00000000202e06b8 ->
> >> 00000000202e48b7] overlaps section .data.shared_aligned
> >> [00000000202e06b8 -> 00000000202e0723]
> >> i imagine other arches which support the ROM config option and thus do
> >> funky placement would see similar issues ...
> >>
> >> on x86, it is stuck in a dedicated section:
> >> [ 8] .data PROGBITS ffffffff810ec000 2ec000
> >> 0303a8 00 WA 0 0 4096
> >> [ 9] .data.shared_alig PROGBITS ffffffff8111c3c0 31c3c0
> >> 0000c8 00 WA 0 0 64
> >>
> >> the ifdef forest in asm-generic/percpu.h is beyond a quick glance &
> >> fix, so i leave it up to someone else ;)
> >
> > as there any resolution on this?
> > I briefly looked at it some time ago.
> > And it looks like a plain oversight.
>
> no, it's still broken in 2.6.35 :(
> $ make ARCH=blackfin BF537-STAMP_defconfig
> $ make ARCH=blackfin -s -j4
> $ readelf -WS vmlinux | grep '\<data\>'
> [10] .data PROGBITS 0018369c 17269c 012964 00 WA 0 0 4
> [11] .data..shared_aligned PROGBITS 00196000 185000 00006c 00
> WA 0 0 4
Following simple patch should deal with it.
Jeremy - you introduced this in ("x86/i386: Put aligned
stack-canary in percpu shared_aligned section")
53f824520b6d84ca5b4a8fd71addc91dbf64357e
Does the following simple fix look correct to you?
Sam
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
index 030a954..e87260f 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@
#define DATA_DATA \
*(.data) \
*(.ref.data) \
+ *(.data..shared_aligned) /* percpu related */ \
DEV_KEEP(init.data) \
DEV_KEEP(exit.data) \
CPU_KEEP(init.data) \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-04 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-21 20:58 Mike Frysinger
2010-08-04 11:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-08-04 18:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-04 20:28 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2010-08-04 20:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-08-05 5:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-26 7:19 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-28 6:00 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-10-18 6:27 ` [PATCH] vmlinux.lds.h: gather .data..shared_aligned sections in DATA_DATA Mike Frysinger
2010-10-18 6:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-10-18 15:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100804202806.GA22134@merkur.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®