From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759730Ab0HEGZg (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2010 02:25:36 -0400 Received: from ksp.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.206]:57056 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757668Ab0HEGZf (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2010 02:25:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:24:32 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: James Morris Cc: John Johansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [AppArmor #7 0/13] AppArmor security module Message-ID: <20100805062431.GA1546@ucw.cz> References: <1280440089-3203-1-git-send-email-john.johansen@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 2010-07-30 09:05:23, James Morris wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, John Johansen wrote: > > > This is the seveth general posting of the newest version of the > > AppArmor security module it has been rewritten to use the security_path > > hooks instead of the previous vfs approach. The current implementation > > is aimed at being as semantically close to previous versions of AppArmor > > as possible while using the existing LSM infrastructure. > > Applied to > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next > > Please carry out any further development against the above tree. > > Note that I added the patch below to update AA against the latest > version of path_truncate: Ok, so now we have two name-based "security" modules. Can we at least drop TOMOYO? That seems to have all apparmor disadvantages plus some more... -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html