From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Cc: stable-review@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Subject: [28/34] drm/i915: Fix LVDS presence check
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:57:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100806185836.358150448@clark.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100806185853.GA28270@kroah.com>
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
Combined patches from 2.6.33 for fixing LVDS detection.
7cf4f69d3f4511f443473954456cb91d5514756d
drm/i915: Don't set up the LVDS if it isn't in the BIOS device table.
38b3037ee47fbd65a36bc7c39f60a900fbbe3b8e
drm/i915: Fix LVDS presence check
6e36595a2131e7ed5ee2674be54b2713ba7f0490
drm/i915: Declare the new VBT parsing functions as static
11ba159288f1bfc1a475c994e598f5fe423fde9d
drm/i915: Don't check for lid presence when detecting LVDS
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c | 90 +++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
@@ -901,64 +901,45 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id intel_
{ } /* terminating entry */
};
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
/*
- * check_lid_device -- check whether @handle is an ACPI LID device.
- * @handle: ACPI device handle
- * @level : depth in the ACPI namespace tree
- * @context: the number of LID device when we find the device
- * @rv: a return value to fill if desired (Not use)
+ * Enumerate the child dev array parsed from VBT to check whether
+ * the LVDS is present.
+ * If it is present, return 1.
+ * If it is not present, return false.
+ * If no child dev is parsed from VBT, it assumes that the LVDS is present.
+ * Note: The addin_offset should also be checked for LVDS panel.
+ * Only when it is non-zero, it is assumed that it is present.
*/
-static acpi_status
-check_lid_device(acpi_handle handle, u32 level, void *context,
- void **return_value)
+static int lvds_is_present_in_vbt(struct drm_device *dev)
{
- struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
- int *lid_present = context;
-
- acpi_dev = NULL;
- /* Get the acpi device for device handle */
- if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev) || !acpi_dev) {
- /* If there is no ACPI device for handle, return */
- return AE_OK;
- }
-
- if (!strncmp(acpi_device_hid(acpi_dev), "PNP0C0D", 7))
- *lid_present = 1;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+ struct child_device_config *p_child;
+ int i, ret;
- return AE_OK;
-}
+ if (!dev_priv->child_dev_num)
+ return 1;
-/**
- * check whether there exists the ACPI LID device by enumerating the ACPI
- * device tree.
- */
-static int intel_lid_present(void)
-{
- int lid_present = 0;
+ ret = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->child_dev_num; i++) {
+ p_child = dev_priv->child_dev + i;
+ /*
+ * If the device type is not LFP, continue.
+ * If the device type is 0x22, it is also regarded as LFP.
+ */
+ if (p_child->device_type != DEVICE_TYPE_INT_LFP &&
+ p_child->device_type != DEVICE_TYPE_LFP)
+ continue;
- if (acpi_disabled) {
- /* If ACPI is disabled, there is no ACPI device tree to
- * check, so assume the LID device would have been present.
+ /* The addin_offset should be checked. Only when it is
+ * non-zero, it is regarded as present.
*/
- return 1;
+ if (p_child->addin_offset) {
+ ret = 1;
+ break;
+ }
}
-
- acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
- ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
- check_lid_device, &lid_present, NULL);
-
- return lid_present;
-}
-#else
-static int intel_lid_present(void)
-{
- /* In the absence of ACPI built in, assume that the LID device would
- * have been present.
- */
- return 1;
+ return ret;
}
-#endif
/**
* intel_lvds_init - setup LVDS connectors on this device
@@ -983,15 +964,10 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_device *
if (dmi_check_system(intel_no_lvds))
return;
- /* Assume that any device without an ACPI LID device also doesn't
- * have an integrated LVDS. We would be better off parsing the BIOS
- * to get a reliable indicator, but that code isn't written yet.
- *
- * In the case of all-in-one desktops using LVDS that we've seen,
- * they're using SDVO LVDS.
- */
- if (!intel_lid_present())
+ if (!lvds_is_present_in_vbt(dev)) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LVDS is not present in VBT\n");
return;
+ }
if (IS_IGDNG(dev)) {
if ((I915_READ(PCH_LVDS) & LVDS_DETECTED) == 0)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-06 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-06 18:58 [00/34] 2.6.32.18-stable review Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:56 ` [01/34] sched: cgroup: Implement different treatment for idle shares Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:56 ` [02/34] mm: fix ia64 crash when gcore reads gate area Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:56 ` [03/34] Re: acl trouble after upgrading ubuntu Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:56 ` [04/34] comedi: Uncripple 8255-based DIO subdevices Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [05/34] NFS: kswapd must not block in nfs_release_page Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [06/34] PARISC: led.c - fix potential stack overflow in led_proc_write() Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [07/34] arm/imx/gpio: add spinlock protection Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [08/34] parisc: pass through \t to early (iodc) console Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [09/34] amd64_edac: Fix DCT base address selector Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [10/34] amd64_edac: Correct scrub rate setting Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [11/34] e1000e: dont inadvertently re-set INTX_DISABLE Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [12/34] e1000e: 82577/82578 PHY register access issues Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [13/34] 9p: strlen() doesnt count the terminator Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [14/34] ath9k: enable serialize_regmode for non-PCIE AR9160 Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [15/34] ath9k_hw: fix an off-by-one error in the PDADC boundaries calculation Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [16/34] ath9k: fix TSF after reset on AR913x Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [17/34] ath9k: fix yet another buffer leak in the tx aggregation code Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [18/34] iwlwifi: fix scan abort Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [19/34] cfg80211: ignore spurious deauth Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [20/34] cfg80211: dont get expired BSSes Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [21/34] xfs: prevent swapext from operating on write-only files Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [22/34] SCSI: enclosure: fix error path - actually return ERR_PTR() on error Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [23/34] GFS2: rename causes kernel Oops Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [24/34] slow-work: use get_ref wrapper instead of directly calling get_ref Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [25/34] CIFS: Remove __exit mark from cifs_exit_dns_resolver() Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [26/34] CIFS: Fix compile error with __init in cifs_init_dns_resolver() definition Greg KH
2010-08-06 20:53 ` [Stable-review] " Ben Hutchings
2010-08-06 21:06 ` Greg KH
2010-08-07 3:38 ` Michael Neuling
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [27/34] xen: drop xen_sched_clock in favour of using plain wallclock time Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [29/34] drm/i915: parse child device from VBT Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [30/34] Revert "ssb: Handle Netbook devices where the SPROM address is changed" Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [31/34] ssb: do not read SPROM if it does not exist Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [32/34] ssb: Look for SPROM at different offset on higher rev CC Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [33/34] ssb: fix NULL ptr deref when pcihost_wrapper is used Greg KH
2010-08-06 18:57 ` [34/34] ssb: Handle alternate SSPROM location Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100806185836.358150448@clark.site \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=ajax@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-review@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®