From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
willy@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: perf build broke by list_head changes...
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:44:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100810124445.GA14843@merkur.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C6147DE.9050608@tilera.com>
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 08:36:46AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 8/10/2010 2:57 AM, David Miller wrote:
> > Commit:
> >
> > commit de5d9bf6541736dc7ad264d2b5cc99bc1b2ad958
> > Author: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
> > Date: Fri Jul 2 13:41:14 2010 -0400
> >
> > Move list types from <linux/list.h> to <linux/types.h>.
> >
> > broke the build of 'perf'.
> >
> > If you move "struct list_head" into types.h, this means perf stops
> > building because it depends upon being able to include linux/list.h
> > from a userland application and at the same time be able to get the
> > basic data types without defining __KERNEL__ or similar.
> >
>
> If necessary, it certainly would be easy to move the list.h types to
> follow struct ustat, then bump the #endif up above them with a comment
> about the perf system's use of them.
>
> I'm confused, though, since <linux/list.h> isn't installed by
> headers_install, so how was perf finding that definition before anyway?
kernel devs usually tell people not to use kernel
headers direct.
But perf does so a lot.
$ cd tools/perf/util; git grep '../../..'
header.h:#include "../../../include/linux/perf_event.h"
include/asm/byteorder.h:#include "../../../../include/linux/swab.h"
include/linux/hash.h:#include "../../../../include/linux/hash.h"
include/linux/list.h:#include "../../../../include/linux/list.h"
include/linux/poison.h:#include "../../../../include/linux/poison.h"
include/linux/rbtree.h:#include "../../../../include/linux/rbtree.h"
parse-events.c:#include "../../../include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h"
parse-events.c: snprintf(evt_path, MAXPATHLEN, "%s/%s/%s/id", debugfs_path,
parse-events.c: snprintf(evt_path, MAXPATHLEN, "%s/%s/%s/id", debugfs_path,
session.h:#include "../../../include/linux/perf_event.h"
util.h:#include "../../../include/linux/magic.h"
util.h:#include "../../../include/linux/stringify.h"
IMO the patch that moves list_head to types.h is fine.
And perf needs to learn good manner with respect to
kernel headers.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-10 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-10 6:57 David Miller
2010-08-10 12:36 ` Chris Metcalf
2010-08-10 12:44 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2010-08-10 13:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-08-10 14:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-10 16:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-08-10 14:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-08-10 16:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-08-10 15:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100810124445.GA14843@merkur.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®