From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] jbd: remove dependency on __GFP_NOFAIL
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:21:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100823222100.GE3380@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100823151129.433875d9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon 23-08-10 15:11:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:03:47 +0200
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> > So do
> > you think that we should keep __GFP_NOFAIL as long as all callers are not
> > able to handle allocation failures in more reasonable way?
>
> The concept should be encapsulated in _some_ centralised fashion.
>
> Helper functions would work as well as __GFP_NOFAIL, and will move any
> runtime cost away from the good code and push it onto the bad code.
Makes sense. Removed the patch.
David, could you provide a function for non-failing allocation and then
use this from JBD and whatever else code is also affected? That looks like
a cleaner solution as Andrew points out...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-23 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 2:57 [patch 0/6] " David Rientjes
2010-08-17 2:57 ` [patch 1/6] md: " David Rientjes
2010-08-23 19:26 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 19:35 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 20:03 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 20:08 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 20:23 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 20:37 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 20:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-23 20:13 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 20:29 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-23 20:40 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-17 2:57 ` [patch 2/6] btrfs: " David Rientjes
2010-08-17 2:57 ` [patch 3/6] gfs2: " David Rientjes
2010-08-17 2:58 ` [patch 4/6] jbd: " David Rientjes
2010-08-17 9:51 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-17 17:48 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 19:28 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 22:03 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-23 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 22:21 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2010-08-23 22:22 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-17 2:58 ` [patch 5/6] ntfs: " David Rientjes
2010-08-17 2:58 ` [patch 6/6] reiserfs: " David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100823222100.GE3380@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®