From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: uaccess: Implement strict user copy checks
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:40:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100825144040.GI2153@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201008251555.53653.arnd@arndb.de>
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 03:55:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 August 2010, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > I think it would be easier to remove the config option entirely on s390
> > > and just always warn. As I said earlier in this thread, I generally
> > > don't think this particular warning is more important than a lot of
> > > the other ones that we don't turn into errors.
> >
> > I disagree: a default kernel build should compile without the noise of
> > tens of false positive warnings.
> > Nobody would look at new warnings and fix possible bugs.
> > That's why I want to have an option to turn the warnings off (default).
> >
> > Or are you volunteering to "fix" all the false positives? :)
>
> If you don't want to see the warnings, then just remove the strict checks.
> We already concluded that there is little value in them on s390 since it only
> shows false postives.
>
> Maybe the easiest way would be to rename the option on s390 and move all
> the other ones into a common place.
Yes, feel free to do that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-25 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-04 3:02 [PATCH] " Stephen Boyd
2010-08-10 22:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-08-10 22:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-11 0:27 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-08-18 1:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Stephen Boyd
2010-08-18 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-18 19:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-08-19 11:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-24 15:06 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-08-24 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-24 15:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-08-25 12:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-25 12:54 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-08-25 13:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-25 14:40 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2010-08-28 1:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-08-28 7:43 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-08-28 9:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-04 4:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-09-14 3:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-09-14 8:25 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-09-14 13:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-14 14:18 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-08-19 2:28 ` [PATCHv2 2/1] Consolidate CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS Stephen Boyd
2010-08-19 4:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-08-19 4:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-19 11:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-11 3:04 ` [PATCH] ARM: uaccess: Implement strict user copy checks Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-11 18:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-08-12 15:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100825144040.GI2153@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome