From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756496Ab0HaEpj (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:45:39 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:55216 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754471Ab0HaEpi (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:45:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100830.214554.42790757.davem@davemloft.net> To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: joe@perches.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de, James.Bottomley@suse.de Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net tree From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20100831135831.b0f124c4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20100831125738.7f18610b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1283224474.1759.30.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20100831135831.b0f124c4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:58:31 +1000 > Yes, but there were comments on that and nothing since. I think that > James would like a minimal patch that just fixes the newly introduced > warnings. I think James is being overly difficult, and since it effects his code you'd think that he might be a bit proactive and maybe spend the 5 freakin' minutes it might take to write the patch that matches his exact requirements if they are so important. Or, at least, I'm sure he could find enough time to sort it out in the past month and a half don't you think? I may be weird and a moron, but that's what I would do if my subsystem had a build warning that was bugging people.