From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/5] [PATCH] sched: merge cpu_to_core_group functions
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:26:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100831082606.GA2166@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1281733914.2704.28.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com>
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:11:54PM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:25 -0700, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > diff -urpN linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c linux-2.6-patched/kernel/sched.c
> > --- linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c 2010-08-11 13:47:16.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6-patched/kernel/sched.c 2010-08-11 13:47:22.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -6546,31 +6546,23 @@ cpu_to_cpu_group(int cpu, const struct c
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct static_sched_domain, core_domains);
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct static_sched_group, sched_group_core);
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_MC */
> >
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_MC) && defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT)
> > static int
> > cpu_to_core_group(int cpu, const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
> > struct sched_group **sg, struct cpumask *mask)
> > {
> > int group;
> > -
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> > cpumask_and(mask, topology_thread_cpumask(cpu), cpu_map);
> > group = cpumask_first(mask);
> > +#else
> > + group = cpu;
> > +#endif
> > if (sg)
> > *sg = &per_cpu(sched_group_core, group).sg;
> > return group;
> > }
> > -#elif defined(CONFIG_SCHED_MC)
> > -static int
> > -cpu_to_core_group(int cpu, const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
> > - struct sched_group **sg, struct cpumask *unused)
> > -{
> > - if (sg)
> > - *sg = &per_cpu(sched_group_core, cpu).sg;
> > - return cpu;
> > -}
> > -#endif
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_MC */
> >
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct static_sched_domain, phys_domains);
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct static_sched_group, sched_group_phys);
>
> Reason why this code was structured like this was because of the
> feedback from Andrew Morton. http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/27/308
Well, if I wouldn't merge this then the upcoming cpu_to_book_group
function would just be horribly long and unreadable. I think merging
this so it looks the same like cpu_to_phys_group is the right thing
to do.
If I wouldn't do that then the cpu_to_book_group function would just
be a real big mess instead of quite simple function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-31 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-12 17:25 [PATCH/RFC 0/5] sched: add new 'book' scheduling domain Heiko Carstens
2010-08-12 17:25 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/5] [PATCH] sched: merge cpu_to_core_group functions Heiko Carstens
2010-08-13 21:11 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-08-31 8:26 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2010-08-12 17:25 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/5] [PATCH] sched: pass sched_domain_level to sched_power_savings_store Heiko Carstens
2010-08-13 21:13 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-08-19 11:36 ` Andreas Herrmann
2010-08-16 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 11:41 ` Andreas Herrmann
2010-08-19 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 12:32 ` Andreas Herrmann
2010-08-12 17:25 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/5] [PATCH] sched: add book scheduling domain Heiko Carstens
2010-08-13 21:22 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-08-16 8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-12 17:25 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/5] [PATCH] topology/sysfs: provide book id and siblings attributes Heiko Carstens
2010-08-12 17:25 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/5] [PATCH] topology: add z196 cpu topology support Heiko Carstens
2010-08-19 12:22 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/5] sched: add new 'book' scheduling domain Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100831082606.GA2166@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®