From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752559Ab0IAHdd (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2010 03:33:33 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:39842 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750812Ab0IAHdb (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2010 03:33:31 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: page allocator: Calculate a better estimate of NR_FREE_PAGES when memory is low and kswapd is awake Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel List , linux-mm@kvack.org, Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Minchan Kim , Christoph Lameter , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki In-Reply-To: <20100901072402.GE13677@csn.ul.ie> References: <20100901083425.971F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100901072402.GE13677@csn.ul.ie> Message-Id: <20100901163146.9755.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:33:24 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 08:37:41AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > > > +/* Called when a more accurate view of NR_FREE_PAGES is needed */ > > > +unsigned long zone_nr_free_pages(struct zone *zone) > > > +{ > > > + unsigned long nr_free_pages = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES); > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * While kswapd is awake, it is considered the zone is under some > > > + * memory pressure. Under pressure, there is a risk that > > > + * per-cpu-counter-drift will allow the min watermark to be breached > > > + * potentially causing a live-lock. While kswapd is awake and > > > + * free pages are low, get a better estimate for free pages > > > + */ > > > + if (nr_free_pages < zone->percpu_drift_mark && > > > + !waitqueue_active(&zone->zone_pgdat->kswapd_wait)) { > > > + int cpu; > > > + > > > + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { > > > + struct per_cpu_pageset *pset; > > > + > > > + pset = per_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset, cpu); > > > + nr_free_pages += pset->vm_stat_diff[NR_FREE_PAGES]; > > > > If my understanding is correct, we have no lock when reading pset->vm_stat_diff. > > It mean nr_free_pages can reach negative value at very rarely race. boundary > > check is necessary? > > > > True, well spotted. > > How about the following? It records a delta and checks if delta is negative > and would cause underflow. > > unsigned long zone_nr_free_pages(struct zone *zone) > { > unsigned long nr_free_pages = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES); > long delta = 0; > > /* > * While kswapd is awake, it is considered the zone is under some > * memory pressure. Under pressure, there is a risk that > * per-cpu-counter-drift will allow the min watermark to be breached > * potentially causing a live-lock. While kswapd is awake and > * free pages are low, get a better estimate for free pages > */ > if (nr_free_pages < zone->percpu_drift_mark && > !waitqueue_active(&zone->zone_pgdat->kswapd_wait)) { > int cpu; > > for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { > struct per_cpu_pageset *pset; > > pset = per_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset, cpu); > delta += pset->vm_stat_diff[NR_FREE_PAGES]; > } > } > > /* Watch for underflow */ > if (delta < 0 && abs(delta) > nr_free_pages) > delta = -nr_free_pages; > > return nr_free_pages + delta; > } Looks good to me :) Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro Thanks.