From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753636Ab0IBF7K (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2010 01:59:10 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:32769 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751204Ab0IBF7I (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2010 01:59:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=jaVcTEGbRzL90HDm/ghMfGkS2jXE3Lt7vo05TWgLGxnP41Xwic+uwtfiA6RH+LnCRC /tcT3tGxJHypMEMN01lhh+/a4Exr0bDOeG9tp5QiJl5pfL7XeLZHaUEXBERozTMXzWTU A1KiNrtoxYxMAc//qYzm7oxBAQjzqtud9IKBQ= Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:59:07 +0200 From: Richard Cochran To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, khc@pm.waw.pl, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eric.y.miao@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: fix pci_set_consistent_dma_mask for dmabounce devices Message-ID: <20100902055907.GA3287@riccoc20.at.omicron.at> References: <20100819174426O.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20100901085738.GJ8142@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100902114937X.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100902114937X.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:50:33AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > btw, I can't compile ARCH_IXP4XX without the following patch: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg95933.html I have the same problem. Compilation of IXP4xx was broken by commit 4fa5518c65df7a2c4b6c58061ac53d0b01228042 Author: Eric Miao Date: Sat Jun 5 15:16:17 2010 +0800 [ARM] pxa: remove now unnecessary dma_needs_bounce() What is the correct way to do fix this? Is the above patch the solution, or is dma_needs_bounce() perhaps also unnecessary for ixp? Thanks, Richard