From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
andi@firstfloor.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [arch-x86] Allow SRAT integrity check to be skipped
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:57:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100902065731.GB29972@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100901213318.19353.54619.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
* Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> wrote:
> On certain BIOSes, SRAT enumeration isn't exported correctly. This
> leads to NUMA node enumeration failure, and causes the kernel to fall
> back onto a single node treated as flat memory. This can happen on
> large, multi-socket systems (4 or more sockets), and becomes
> problematic for performance.
>
> This patch adds a boot parameter to allow a kernel to be booted with
> the option to skip the SRAT check. There are BIOSes in production
> that have these failures, so this will allow people in the field to
> work around these BIOS issues.
> + sratbypassbios
> + If specified, will skip an SRAT check for PXM coverage
> + from BIOS enumeration. Only to be used on systems with
> + buggy BIOSes that munge the SRAT enumeration.
This isnt a particularly useful solution to users of said systems - they
have to figure out that this option exists, and then they have to enter
this option on the boot line.
A better solution would be to match these systems using DMI filters -
_and_ to also have the boot time option to cover the case where a new
system comes out with such a breakage. (or there's some system not yet
mapped)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-02 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-01 21:33 Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2010-09-01 21:33 ` Andi Kleen
2010-09-01 22:04 ` rdunlap
2010-09-01 22:11 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2010-09-08 19:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-03 10:04 ` Andi Kleen
2010-09-02 6:57 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-09-02 10:03 ` Andi Kleen
2010-09-03 6:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-07 19:38 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2010-09-07 19:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-07 20:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-07 20:16 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2010-09-07 20:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-08 6:55 ` Andi Kleen
2010-09-08 18:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-08 18:51 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100902065731.GB29972@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome