From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755700Ab0IFVQ5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 6 Sep 2010 17:16:57 -0400
Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:57495 "EHLO coco.kroah.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755386Ab0IFVQe (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 6 Sep 2010 17:16:34 -0400
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:09:05 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
        FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
        Pawel Osciak <p.osciak@samsung.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Zach Pfeffer <zpfeffer@codeaurora.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 0/9] CMA + VCMM integration
Message-ID: <20100906210905.GB5863@kroah.com>
References: <cover.1283749231.git.mina86@mina86.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cover.1283749231.git.mina86@mina86.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 08:33:50AM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> This patchset introduces a draft of a redesign of Zach Pfeffer's
> VCMM.

What is a VCMM?

What is a CMA?

> Not all of the functionality of the original VCMM has been
> ported into this patchset.  This is mostly meant as RFC.  Moreover,
> the code for VCMM implementation in this RFC has not been tested.

If you haven't even tested it, why should we review it?

thanks,

greg k-h