From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758205Ab0IGXjI (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 19:39:08 -0400 Received: from 217.59.140-88.rev.gaoland.net ([88.140.59.217]:52479 "EHLO electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756557Ab0IGXjF (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 19:39:05 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 506 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:39:05 EDT Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 01:29:57 +0200 From: Francois Romieu To: Matt Causey Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Simon Kagstrom Subject: Re: Is via-velocity broken in 2.6.34? Message-ID: <20100907232957.GA11595@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organisation: Land of Sunshine Inc. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Please Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Matt Causey : [2.6.29 -> 2.6.34 regression] > Attached is debug.tar. It contains dmesg, config.gz, ethtool, > ifconfig, and lspci output. I'm not sure what else to do at this > point. Is there some debugging I can enable in the kernel to give > more clues as to what's gone wrong? Any chance you could bisect the regression or narrow it down a bit ? Otherwise may I assume that there is no difference in the userspace tools (just in case) ? -- Ueimor