From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755671Ab0IHPaG (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:30:06 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:60730 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752126Ab0IHPaE (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:30:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100908.083022.189687100.davem@davemloft.net> To: matt.causey@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is via-velocity broken in 2.6.34? From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20100907.172434.28821101.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Matt Causey Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 08:27:19 -0700 > config VIA_VELOCITY > tristate "VIA Velocity support" > depends on PCI && PM && ACPI > > since today it's only depending on pci. > > If this is the right thing to do I can submit a patch . Apologies > again for the red herring. :-) Needing ACPI for proper functioning of a moden x86 system is no surprise, and isn't a VIA specific issue :-)