From: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] block: Range check cpu in blk_cpu_to_group
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:41:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009091741.o89HfPfM011522@d03av02.boulder.ibm.com> (raw)
While testing CPU DLPAR, the following problem was discovered.
We were DLPAR removing the first CPU, which in this case was
logical CPUs 0-3. CPUs 0-2 were already marked offline and
we were in the process of offlining CPU 3. After marking
the CPU inactive and offline in cpu_disable, but before the
cpu was completely idle (cpu_die), we ended up in __make_request
on CPU 3. There we looked at the topology map to see which CPU
to complete the I/O on and found no CPUs in the cpu_sibling_map.
This resulted in the block layer setting the completion cpu
to be NR_CPUS, which then caused an oops when we tried to
complete the I/O.
Fix this by sanity checking the value we return from blk_cpu_to_group
to be a valid cpu value.
Signed-off-by: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
block/blk.h | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN block/blk.h~blk_cpu_to_group_range_fix block/blk.h
--- linux-2.6/block/blk.h~blk_cpu_to_group_range_fix 2010-08-31 09:12:18.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6-bjking1/block/blk.h 2010-08-31 16:48:17.000000000 -0500
@@ -142,14 +142,19 @@ static inline int queue_congestion_off_t
static inline int blk_cpu_to_group(int cpu)
{
+ int group = NR_CPUS;
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
const struct cpumask *mask = cpu_coregroup_mask(cpu);
- return cpumask_first(mask);
+ group = cpumask_first(mask);
#elif defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT)
- return cpumask_first(topology_thread_cpumask(cpu));
+ group = cpumask_first(topology_thread_cpumask(cpu));
#else
return cpu;
#endif
+
+ if (likely(group < NR_CPUS))
+ return group;
+ return cpu;
}
/*
_
next reply other threads:[~2010-09-09 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-09 17:41 Brian King [this message]
2010-09-10 10:07 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201009091741.o89HfPfM011522@d03av02.boulder.ibm.com \
--to=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®