From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM: Fix potential issue with failing asynchronous suspend
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:59:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100920185929.GB29380@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009202000.45147.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:00:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Subject: PM: Fix potential issue with failing asynchronous suspend
>
> There is a potential issue with the asynchronous suspend code that
> a device driver suspending asynchronously may not notice that it
> should back off. There are two failing scenarions, (1) when the
> driver is waiting for a driver suspending synchronously to complete
> and that second driver returns error code, in which case async_error
> won't be set and the waiting driver will continue suspending and (2)
> after the driver has called device_pm_wait_for_dev() and the waited
> for driver returns error code, in which case the caller of
> device_pm_wait_for_dev() will not know that there was an error and
> will continue suspending.
>
> To fix this issue make __device_suspend() set async_error, so
> async_suspend() doesn't need to set it any more, and make
> device_pm_wait_for_dev() return async_error, so that its callers
> can check whether or not they should continue suspending.
>
> No more changes are necessary, since device_pm_wait_for_dev() in
> not used by any drivers' suspend routines.
>
> Reported-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-20 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-20 17:57 [PATCH 0/2] PM: Wakeup sources and async suspend error path bug fix Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 17:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / Wakeup: Introduce wakeup source objects and event statistics (v3) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 18:59 ` Greg KH
2010-09-20 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM: Fix potential issue with failing asynchronous suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 18:59 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-09-22 23:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] PM: Wakeup sources and async suspend error path bug fix Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-03 22:04 ` [linux-pm] " mark gross
2010-10-03 23:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-10-04 3:29 ` mark gross
2010-10-04 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100920185929.GB29380@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome