From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] timer: fix deadlock on cpu hotplug
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:37:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100922083706.GA2177@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285083618.2275.884.camel@laptop>
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 05:40:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 17:36 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I think this is the second time we're seeing deadlock during cpu down
> > due to RT throttling and timer problem. The rather delicate
> > dependency there makes me somewhat nervous. If possible, I think it
> > would be better if we can simply turn the RT throttling off when
> > cpu_stop kicks in. It's intended to be a mechanism to monopolize all
> > CPU cycles to begin with. Would that be difficult?
>
> I've wanted to pull the whole migration thread out from SCHED_FIFO for a
> while. Doing that is probably the easiest thing.
Something like this?
diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index 4372ccb..854fd57 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -291,7 +291,6 @@ repeat:
static int __cpuinit cpu_stop_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
- struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO - 1 };
unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
struct cpu_stopper *stopper = &per_cpu(cpu_stopper, cpu);
struct task_struct *p;
@@ -304,7 +303,6 @@ static int __cpuinit cpu_stop_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
cpu);
if (IS_ERR(p))
return NOTIFY_BAD;
- sched_setscheduler_nocheck(p, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m);
get_task_struct(p);
stopper->thread = p;
break;
...gets stuck nearly immediatly on cpu hotplug stress if the machine is
doing anything but idling around.
I was too lazy to figure out why it got stuck. I'm afraid that with such
a change a new class of bugs will appear.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-22 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-21 14:20 Heiko Carstens
2010-09-21 15:36 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-21 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-22 8:37 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2010-09-22 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-22 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-23 13:31 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-09-25 0:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-11 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-11 13:51 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-10-18 19:16 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Create special class for stop/migrate work tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-21 15:39 ` [PATCH/RFC] timer: fix deadlock on cpu hotplug Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100922083706.GA2177@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome