From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756561Ab0IWUVb (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:21:31 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:50482 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753502Ab0IWUVa (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:21:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:43:59 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Richard Cochran , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , David Miller , John Stultz , Krzysztof Halasa , Peter Zijlstra , Rodolfo Giometti , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] ptp: Added a clock that uses the eTSEC found on the MPC85xx. Message-ID: <20100923214359.3f287b11@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <57b64051c816dc9cb856bbb9f38fc901c9d3d651.1285261535.git.richard.cochran@omicron.at> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Please do not introduce useless additional layers for clock sync. Load > these ptp clocks like the other regular clock modules and make them sync > system time like any other clock. I don't think you understand PTP. PTP has masters, a system can need to be honouring multiple conflicting masters at once. > Really guys: I want a PTP solution! Now! And not some idiotic additional > kernel layers that just pass bits around because its so much fun and > screws up clock accurary in due to the latency noise introduced while > having so much fun with the bits. There are some interesting complications in putting a PTP sync interface in kernel.