From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoid second smp_processor_id() call in __touch_watchdog
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:43:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100925174359.GA5449@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100924193447.GT26290@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2428 bytes --]
On (09/24/10 15:34), Don Zickus wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:00:12PM +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Per our previous conversation:
> >
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Fair enough, although strictly speaking this should be done in a
> > > separate and later patch.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Avoid double smp_processor_id() call in __touch_watchdog (smp_processor_id()
> > itself and later call in __get_cpu_var())
>
> Dropping this patch then based on Peter's and Frederic's feedback that the
> compiler probably already optimizes for this, leaving readability as a good
> excuse not to change anything.
>
Hello,
gcc 4.5.1, x86_64
Dump of assembler code for function __touch_watchdog:
<+0>: push %rbp
<+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp
<+4>: push %r12
<+6>: push %rbx
<+7>: mov $0x0,%rbx
<+14>: callq 0x43 <__touch_watchdog+19>
<+19>: mov %eax,%r12d
<+22>: callq 0x4b <__touch_watchdog+27>
<+27>: mov %eax,%eax
<+29>: mov %r12d,%edi
<+32>: add 0x0(,%rax,8),%rbx
<+40>: callq 0x5d <__touch_watchdog+45>
<+45>: shr $0x1e,%rax
<+49>: mov %rax,(%rbx)
<+52>: pop %rbx
<+53>: pop %r12
<+55>: leaveq
<+56>: retq
patched __touch_watchdog:
Dump of assembler code for function __touch_watchdog:
<+0>: push %rbp
<+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp
<+4>: push %rbx
<+5>: mov $0x0,%rbx
<+12>: sub $0x8,%rsp
<+16>: callq 0x45 <__touch_watchdog+21>
<+21>: movslq %eax,%rdx
<+24>: mov %eax,%edi
<+26>: add 0x0(,%rdx,8),%rbx
<+34>: callq 0x57 <__touch_watchdog+39>
<+39>: shr $0x1e,%rax
<+43>: mov %rax,(%rbx)
<+46>: pop %rax
<+47>: pop %rbx
<+48>: leaveq
<+49>: retq
Sergey
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> > index 7f9c3c5..03d97c5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> > +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> > @@ -116,8 +116,7 @@ static unsigned long get_sample_period(void)
> > static void __touch_watchdog(void)
> > {
> > int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > -
> > - __get_cpu_var(watchdog_touch_ts) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
> > + per_cpu(watchdog_touch_ts, this_cpu) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
> > }
> >
> > void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
> >
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-25 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-13 10:21 fix BUG: using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-16 8:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-16 13:34 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-16 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-16 14:08 ` [PATCH] fix BUG " Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-16 14:30 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-17 4:27 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-17 2:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-08-17 3:16 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-17 8:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-17 9:05 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-17 9:24 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-17 9:37 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-17 10:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-17 12:48 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-17 10:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-17 12:56 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-17 13:13 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-18 2:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-08-18 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-19 2:27 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-20 2:57 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-20 3:42 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-20 12:34 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-26 17:17 ` acpi_os_stall() and touch_nmi_watchdog() (was Re: [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog) Len Brown
2010-08-20 15:02 ` [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog Yong Zhang
2010-08-26 10:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-26 14:40 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-17 7:56 ` [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog (v2) Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-08-16 14:12 ` fix BUG: using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog Don Zickus
2010-08-16 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-16 14:06 ` Yong Zhang
2010-08-18 19:33 ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-18 21:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-22 9:00 ` [PATCH] avoid second smp_processor_id() call in __touch_watchdog Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-09-22 14:41 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-22 16:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-22 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-22 16:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-24 19:34 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-25 17:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100925174359.GA5449@swordfish.minsk.epam.com \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome