From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-am33-list@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] mn10300: Get rid of set_fs(USER_DS) in sigframe setup
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:48:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100927104804.6377.15062.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100927104749.6377.46813.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
The set_fs(USER_DS) in the signal frame setup code really has no business
being there; short of a serious kernel bug we should already have USER_DS at
that point. It shouldn't have been done on x86 either...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c | 4 ----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
index 5a2c004..ae36480 100644
--- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
@@ -333,8 +333,6 @@ static int setup_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *set,
regs->d0 = sig;
regs->d1 = (unsigned long) &frame->sc;
- set_fs(USER_DS);
-
/* the tracer may want to single-step inside the handler */
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
@@ -416,8 +414,6 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
regs->d0 = sig;
regs->d1 = (long) &frame->info;
- set_fs(USER_DS);
-
/* the tracer may want to single-step inside the handler */
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-27 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-27 10:47 [PATCH 1/5] mn10300: Avoid SIGSEGV delivery loop David Howells
2010-09-27 10:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] mn10300: Prevent double syscall restarts David Howells
2010-09-27 10:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] mn10300: ->restart_block.fn needs to be reset on sigreturn David Howells
2010-09-27 10:48 ` David Howells [this message]
2010-09-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] mn10300: Check __get/put_user() results David Howells
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-26 18:29 [PATCH 4/5] mn10300: get rid of set_fs(USER_DS) in sigframe setup Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100927104804.6377.15062.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-am33-list@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®