From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>,
linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH] Input: add appleir USB driver
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:55:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101005155552.GB19730@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201010050818.35118.oliver@neukum.org>
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:18:35AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2010, 08:08:22 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov:
> > > But what about the next opener? He'll get a completely spurious
> > > key release event, as the next key is pressed.
> >
> > How does the opening of a device handle relate to a device state?
>
> It doesn't.
>
> > Userspace should expect to see releases without presses (in case they
> > weren't the first client that opened the device).
>
> Yes, but based on sane timing. From the time stamps user space
> would conclude that the key had been pressed at an unknown time
> before open and released at the time the event indicates. Possibly
> it would compute that the key had been held for at least hours.
>
I do not understand. If a client never seen the "press" event and only
saw "release" event it can't make any assumptions about timing. Press
could be a millisecond ago or an hour ago, it just does not know. And
such scenario can easily happen if the client is second to open the
device.
I think the only sane behavior for clients is to ignore release events
for keys that they did not see "down" event for.
-
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-05 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-30 10:57 Bastien Nocera
2010-09-30 15:47 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-09-30 15:51 ` Bastien Nocera
2010-10-08 0:39 ` Jarod Wilson
2010-11-18 4:18 ` Bastien Nocera
2010-11-19 18:07 ` Jarod Wilson
2010-10-04 19:17 ` Oliver Neukum
2010-10-05 4:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-10-05 6:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2010-10-05 6:08 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-10-05 6:18 ` Oliver Neukum
2010-10-05 15:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2010-10-05 16:07 ` Oliver Neukum
2010-10-05 16:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101005155552.GB19730@core.coreip.homeip.net \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®